In 3 years, how would the RDS infrastructure be? Warranties will need to be renewed, maybe new OS will appear, how many hours every technician will have dedicated. The money they will spend for that is around 150k and it's the same amount that they would spend in 3yr if they go for a SaaS scenario. Is Remote Desktop Services (aka Terminal Services) still a useful technology for this scenario? Do you still recommend it to clients? It's only me that I see that is a wrong strategy? Or do you guys think RDS still need some love?Įach client I have that was using RDS it's a mess! Users using local desktop without GPOs to do everything they can't do on TS and of course no AV/EDR because they only "use" RDS.
instead of buying some M365/Azure licensing and go a full SaaS stack that would simplify and modernize the company. I mean., only thinking the headache of managing 300 users on terminal server(across many servers), incidents, changes, maintenance, sizing, hardware, updates. This consultant said that first thing to do, was to renew everything and go full RDS scenario buying hardware, licenses and removing old servers.
) before migrating that W2003 servers to SaaS services when a wild harvad-oxford consultant rated 10.000$ per hour appeared. I was trying to design a roadmap to secure some critical points on infrastructure and get a minimum of security (fw, edr, filtering. They have around 15 offices in my country and each one have the same stack -> DC, SQL Server and file server on a Hyper-V host.ĭC, SQL and File Server is a mix of W2003(yeah 2003 still alive) and W2008R2 and they're around 300 devices/users. Hi! Got a conversation last week with a potentially new client that was looking to secure his infrastructure and was asking for cybersecurity services.
0 kommentar(er)
